Article
The state of SMB payments: What the data tells us across markets
What our research with Visa reveals about embedded payments trends in the US, UK, and Germany.

Nearly two thirds of the 1,506 SMBs we surveyed* with Visa now run payments directly within their business software. A decade ago, that number would’ve been unthinkable. Today, it’s becoming the baseline and a key revenue driver.
Yet despite this momentum, only 38% can accurately define what embedded payments actually are. Across markets, even when adoption is high, usage has outpaced foundational understanding.
As a result, most SMBs are only capturing a fraction of the value. Beyond operational efficiency, embedded payments can drive revenue growth, improve customer experiences, and lay the groundwork for broader financial products.
For SaaS platforms, this is where the biggest opportunities for adoption and growth lie.
_____
*Methodology: Based on an Adyen and Visa survey of 1,506 SMBs across the UK, US, and Germany. Respondents were decision-makers for payment systems at businesses with up to 250 employees, all using software platforms. Conducted January to March 2026.
Where the US, UK, and Germany diverge
Before breaking down the consolidated global data, it’s worth looking at regional nuances. The path to adoption varies by market, and will shape how you position your platform to local SMBs.
Understand embedded payments
United States
40%
United Kingdom
39%
Germany
36%
Top reason for adopting
United States
Faster cash flow (55%)
United Kingdom
More payment options (52%)
Germany
Less manual work (46%)
Top barrier for non-users
United States
Current process works (51%)
United Kingdom
Current process works (47%)
Germany
Customers prefer invoices (40%)
The US runs on cash flow. Faster access to funds is a vital differentiator, with 55% of SMBs adopting for speed. Still, 51% of non-adopters claim their current setup "works," but relying on legacy processes can be a costly compromise. Read the state of SMB payments in the US →
The UK runs on flexibility. 52% of UK SMBs adopt embedded payments specifically for payment choice. Yet the UK is the only market where “previous implementation issues” is one of the top factors stalling deals. Read the state of SMB payments in the UK →
Germany runs on structure. 40% of SMBs remain tied to manual invoicing, while another 33% hesitate over compliance. Early adopters, however, unlock instant ROI: replacing manual work with fully automated financial workflows. Read the state of SMB payments in Germany (Note: This is written in German) →
Embedded payments adoption follows friction
65% of SMBs use embedded payments. However, embedded payments adoption varies based on the software a business uses, how many people it employs, and what industry it operates in.
Software type: SMBs using industry-specific platforms adopt at 72%, compared to 60% on general finance software.
Company size: SMBs with 51 to 250 employees adopt at 72%, compared to 61% for those with 50 or fewer.
Industry focus: Food and beverage leads at 79% while professional services sits at 59% — highlighting the difference between a high-volume restaurant group and a traditional accounting firm.
It's a useful signal for platforms selling horizontally. Reach puts you in front of the business, but industry fit is often what wins it.
Software type
Higher adoption of embedded payments
Industry-specific platform (72%)
Lower adoption of embedded payments
General finance software (60%)
Company size
Higher adoption of embedded payments
51 to 250 employees (72%)
Lower adoption of embedded payments
Up to 50 employees (61%)
Industry
Higher adoption of embedded payments
Food and beverage (79%)
Lower adoption of embedded payments
Professional services (59%)
The value is real, but few SMBs measure it
SMBs leveraging embedded payments see clear improvements: faster payouts, effortless customer experiences, and a reduced admin burden.
Sentiment also improves as familiarity with the product grows. Among active users, 56% view embedded payments as “very positive”. That number drops to 44% for businesses still weighing the decision, and falls to 13% for those with no plan to adopt.
But saving time is only half the battle. Many local businesses don't realize how many sales they're losing at the point of purchase: long lines that cause walkouts, failed card taps, or customers leaving because their preferred payment method isn't accepted. Without that visibility, payments remain a cost to manage rather than a lever to grow revenue.
For SaaS platforms, this is a strategic opening. The SMBs capturing the most value from embedded payments are those that can clearly measure the returns. Prove the real ROI, and you move from a payment vendor to a true operational partner.
“Good enough” is the hardest competitor to beat
For SMBs that have yet to adopt, the primary barrier is comfort with what already works. Across markets, 44% state their “current process works”, ahead of concerns about cost, capability, or security.
This fundamentally shifts who SaaS platforms are competing against. SMBs are less likely to compare payment providers and more likely to compare against “changing nothing.” For many, “doing nothing” wins.
However, non-adopters don’t all think alike. One in three are considering embedded payments within the next 12 months. For this group, hesitations focus on the switch itself:
23% want to keep payments separate to maintain control
19% had technical trouble during a previous implementation attempt
The SMBs comfortable with the status quo need a concrete case for why standing still can be costly: slower cash flow, more manual work, a more fragmented checkout experience.
For SMBs already evaluating a move, the focus shifts to risk mitigation: giving them the confidence that switching will be seamless, reliable, and supported from day one.
Payments are the entry point, not the endpoint
A long-held belief is that banks are the only place to open a business account, issue a card, or secure working capital.
That assumption is shifting. When asked who they’d go to for embedded payments today, 40% of SMBs chose a software provider compared to 28% who chose a bank.
Borrowing is following a similar path, yet more slowly. Banks still provide short-term credit to 44% of SMBs compared to 21% using software platforms. Among active embedded payments users, platform lending rises to 25%.
Beyond payments, SMBs prioritize what actually moves the needle: faster payouts, built-in accounting, and seamless POS tools. They choose providers on four simple factors: price, speed, trust, and a zero-friction signup.
A software platform that’s proven it can reliably handle daily cash flow has already won the ultimate trust test — putting it steps ahead of legacy alternatives.
What this means for platforms in 2026 (and beyond)
Ten years ago the primary challenge was convincing SMBs that embedded payments were worth adopting. In 2026, the mandate has shifted, and the data points in three directions:
1. Sell where the need is already obvious. Adoption runs highest among larger SMBs, vertical platform users, and transaction-heavy sectors. These SMBs are actively seeking solutions, meaning your platform can solve existing pain points.
2. Complete the workflow during onboarding. Connecting payments to reporting, invoicing, and cash flow visibility turns a standard integration into an indispensable tool. Many users still manage these tasks manually, unaware that alternatives exist within the software they use every day.
3. Follow demand beyond payment processing. 40% of SMBs would prefer to acquire embedded payments from a software provider than a bank, with a quarter of active users already borrowing through their platform. The demand is established — platforms just need to meet it.
Across markets, the direction is clear. The platforms that pull ahead will be those that close the gap between adoption and impact: connecting payments to the workflows, insights, and financial services that SMBs need to scale.
_____

